<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.eiffelroom.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>eiffelroom - .NET debugging - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.com/tag/net_debugging</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;.NET debugging&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>VS 2005 syntax highlighting</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.com/blog/peter_gummer/debugging_an_eiffel_net_dll_within_visual_studio#comment-311</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;The thought crossed my mind that it would be nice. Apart from anything else, the free availability of Eiffel syntax highlighting in VS would help to promote the language, in a small way.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;By the way, the squiggly red syntax error underlining in my screen shot is because I&#039;ve told VS to treat &lt;strong&gt;.e&lt;/strong&gt; files as C# files. This is to prevent an annoying dialog that pops up asking me what encoding to use every time it opens a &lt;strong&gt;.e&lt;/strong&gt; file. I just ignore the red underlining.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 15:52:31 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>peter_gummer</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 311 at http://www.eiffelroom.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>VS 2005 syntax highlighting</title>
 <link>http://www.eiffelroom.com/blog/peter_gummer/debugging_an_eiffel_net_dll_within_visual_studio#comment-308</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ll see what we can do to make the syntax highlighting for VS 2005 freely available since we do use it at Eiffel Software.&lt;/p&gt;

</description>
 <pubDate>Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:03:40 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>manus_eiffel</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 308 at http://www.eiffelroom.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
