http://www.eiffelroom.com/tag/loop Comments for "loop" en http://www.eiffelroom.com/blog/schoelle/what_do_applications_do_after_make#comment-372 <p>I don't think I've ever seen a class which was used as the root of an <em>application</em> project and as a non-root in another project.</p> <p>Note my qualification: an <em>application</em> root. I've seen at least one case where the root class of a DLL was used as a non-root class in an application.</p> <p>In my experience, application root classes are always purpose-built as such. Does anyone ever reuse them in the manner proposed by OOSC2?</p> Wed, 31 Oct 2007 15:29:53 -0700 peter_gummer comment 372 at http://www.eiffelroom.com http://www.eiffelroom.com/blog/schoelle/what_do_applications_do_after_make#comment-371 <p>One meaning of the invariant is that its assertions hold when the root class is not a root class, but is being called by another class.</p> <p>Anyway, your idea is interesting - why not mock up a definition so we can see its merits and demrits more clearly? Colin Adams</p> Wed, 31 Oct 2007 09:01:39 -0700 colin-adams comment 371 at http://www.eiffelroom.com