Recent changes

TypeTitleUserLog
Sun, 27 June 2010
(diff) (hist)20:40Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)20:39Libraryrevised eMPFRChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)20:36Libraryrevised eMPCChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)20:35Libraryrevised eMPFRChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)20:33Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
Wed, 23 June 2010
(diff) (hist)05:38Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
Sat, 19 June 2010
(diff) (hist)01:57Libraryrevised Multiple PrecisionChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)01:50Libraryrevised Multiple PrecisionChris Saunders
Fri, 18 June 2010
(diff) (hist)06:00Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
Thu, 17 June 2010
(diff) (hist)16:46Librarynew Eiffel Arbitrary Precision Number LibraryColin LeMahieu
Tue, 15 June 2010
(comment)19:54Blog entrycomment An object test can be written
on My three Eiffelwishes, part 1: enums from David Le Bansais
Emmanuel Stapf
Mon, 14 June 2010
(comment)22:06Blog entrycomment It doesn't provide the
on My three Eiffelwishes, part 1: enums from David Le Bansais
David Le Bansais
(comment)20:29Blog entrycomment Does the existing language syntax already allow this?
on My three Eiffelwishes, part 1: enums from David Le Bansais
Colin LeMahieu
(comment)16:56Blog entrycomment Thanks for the suggestion.
on My three Eiffelwishes, part 1: enums from David Le Bansais
Emmanuel Stapf
Sun, 13 June 2010
(diff) (hist)13:04Blog entrynew My three Eiffelwishes, part 1: enumsDavid Le Bansais
Sat, 12 June 2010
(diff) (hist)02:44Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
Fri, 11 June 2010
(diff) (hist)22:51Libraryrevised eMPCChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)22:48Librarynew eMPCChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)22:37Librarynew eMPFRChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)22:15Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)22:14Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
Tue, 8 June 2010
(comment)12:39Pollcomment No. That's not right.
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
colin adams
Mon, 7 June 2010
(comment)17:45Pollcomment Ok. Then dates before 1582
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
Dieter Dannerbeck
(comment)15:04Pollcomment ISO 8601
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
colin adams
(comment)12:45Pollcomment It is certain that it is
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
Dieter Dannerbeck
Sat, 5 June 2010
(diff) (hist)03:43Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)03:36Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
Fri, 4 June 2010
(comment)20:40Blog entrycomment I can't comment about the
on Moving to a readable/writable model from David Le Bansais
David Le Bansais
(comment)15:57Blog entrycomment Just a few comments regarding
on Moving to a readable/writable model from David Le Bansais
Emmanuel Stapf
(diff) (hist)09:43Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)09:16Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)09:14Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
(comment)09:02Blog entrycomment base-safe.ecf is the key
on EiffelStudio 6.6 released from Emmanuel Stapf
colin adams
(diff) (hist)07:24Libraryrevised eGMPChris Saunders
(diff) (hist)07:20Librarynew eGMPChris Saunders
(comment)06:01Blog entrycomment I tried it in both default
on EiffelStudio 6.6 released from Emmanuel Stapf
colin adams
Thu, 3 June 2010
(diff) (hist)22:04Blog entrynew Moving to a readable/writable modelDavid Le Bansais
(comment)15:43Blog entrycomment Are you sure you are
on EiffelStudio 6.6 released from Emmanuel Stapf
Emmanuel Stapf
(comment)12:46Blog entrycomment Hm. That is the conformance
on EiffelStudio 6.6 released from Emmanuel Stapf
colin adams
(comment)12:10Blog entrycomment Conformance
on EiffelStudio 6.6 released from Emmanuel Stapf
colin adams
(comment)09:52Blog entrycomment Void safety type-hole
on EiffelStudio 6.6 released from Emmanuel Stapf
colin adams
(comment)07:54Blog entrycomment Use of new check assertion
on EiffelStudio 6.6 released from Emmanuel Stapf
colin adams
(comment)06:03Pollcomment I have not found a function,
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
Dieter Dannerbeck
(comment)05:19Pollcomment Sorry.
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
Dieter Dannerbeck
Wed, 2 June 2010
(comment)14:32Pollcomment Use the adapter pattern
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
Peter Horan
(comment)13:54Pollcomment Note that option 3 (remove
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
colin adams
(comment)13:31Pollcomment You mis-read. I said the
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
colin adams
(comment)09:11Pollcomment This solution is wrong.
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
Dieter Dannerbeck
(comment)07:50Pollcomment The simplest approach is to
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
colin adams
(comment)06:40Pollcomment The first option on this poll is wrong.
on How should we compute the result of DATE.is_leap_year? from Emmanuel Stapf
Dieter Dannerbeck
Syndicate content